Up

Module Nano_mutex

A nano-mutex is a lightweight mutex that can be used only within a single OCaml runtime.

Performance

=============== Nano-mutexes are intended to be significantly cheaper than OS-level mutexes. Creating a nano-mutex allocates a single OCaml record. Locking and unlocking an uncontested nano-mutex take a handful of instructions. Only if a nano-mutex is contested will it fall back to using an OS-level mutex. If a nano-mutex becomes uncontested again, it will switch back to using an OCaml-only lock.

Nano-mutexes can be faster than using OS-level mutexes because OCaml uses a global lock on the runtime, and requires all running OCaml code to hold the lock. The OCaml compiler only allows thread switches at certain points, and we can use that fact to get the atomic test-and-set used in the core of our implementaion without needing any primitive locking, essentially because we're protected by the OCaml global lock.

Here are some benchmarks comparing various mutexes available in OCaml:

      |-------------------------------------------------------------|
      |                       Name | Run time | S. dev. | Allocated |
      |----------------------------+----------+---------+-----------+
      |          Caml.Mutex create |   247 ns |    0 ns |         3 |
      |     Caml.Mutex lock/unlock |    49 ns |    0 ns |         0 |
      |          Core.Mutex create |   698 ns |    0 ns |         3 |
      |     Core.Mutex lock/unlock |    49 ns |    0 ns |         0 |
      |          Nano_mutex create |    10 ns |    0 ns |         4 |
      |     Nano_mutex lock/unlock |    28 ns |    0 ns |         0 |
      |-------------------------------------------------------------|
    

The benchmark code is in core/extended/lib_test/bench_nano_mutex.ml.

Error handling

================== For any mutex, there are design choices as to how to behave in certain situations:

  • recursive locking (when a thread locks a mutex it already has)
  • unlocking an unlocked mutex
  • unlocking a mutex held by another thread

Here is a table comparing how the various mutexes behave:

      |--------------------+------------+------------+------------+
      |                    | Caml.Mutex | Core.Mutex | Nano_mutex |
      |--------------------+------------+------------+------------+
      | recursive lock     | undefined  | error      | error      |
      | unlocking unlocked | undefined  | error      | error      |
      | t1:lock  t2:unlock | undefined  | error      | error      |
      |--------------------+------------+------------+------------+
    

Signature

type t
val sexp_of_t : t -> Sexplib.Sexp.t
val invariant : t -> unit
val create : unit -> t

create () returns a new, unlocked mutex.

val equal : t -> t -> bool

equal is phys_equal

val current_thread_has_lock : t -> bool

current_thread_has_lock t returns true iff the current thread has t locked.

val lock : t -> unit Core_kernel.Std.Or_error.t

lock t locks the mutex t, blocking until it can be locked. lock immediately returns Error if the current thread already holds t.

val lock_exn : t -> unit
val try_lock : t -> [
| `Acquired
| `Not_acquired
] Core_kernel.Std.Or_error.t

try_lock t locks t if it can immediately do so. The result indicates whether try_lock succeeded in acquiring the lock. try_lock returns Error if the current thread already holds t.

val try_lock_exn : t -> [
| `Acquired
| `Not_acquired
]
val unlock : t -> unit Core_kernel.Std.Or_error.t

unlock t unlocks t, if the current thread holds it. unlock returns Error if the lock is not held by the calling thread.

val unlock_exn : t -> unit
val critical_section : t -> f:(unit -> 'a) -> 'a